Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Br J Biomed Sci, 12 January 2022

ACE2 and TMPRSS2 SNPs as Determinants of Susceptibility to, and Severity of, a COVID-19 Infection

S. Abdelsattar
S. Abdelsattar1*Z. A. KasemyZ. A. Kasemy2S. F. EwidaS. F. Ewida3R. A. A. Abo-ElsoudR. A. A. Abo-Elsoud3A. A. ZytoonA. A. Zytoon4G. A. AbdelaalG. A. Abdelaal5A. S. AbdelgawadA. S. Abdelgawad6F. O. KhalilF. O. Khalil7H. F. M. Kamel,H. F. M. Kamel8,9
  • 1Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
  • 2Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
  • 3Department of Medical Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
  • 4Department of Radiodiagnosis, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
  • 5Department of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
  • 6Department of Clinical Pathology, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
  • 7Department of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
  • 8Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Aloura University, Makka, Saudi Arabia
  • 9Department of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Background: Genetic risk factors may be related to the infectivity and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and host transmembrane serine protease (TMPRSS2) have key role in viral cell entrance and priming.

Methods: This case-control study on 147 healthy controls and 299 COVID-19 patients identified potential determinants and risk factors, including gene polymorphism involved in the severity (mild, moderate, severe) of COVID-19 disease defined by CORAD radiological criteria.

Results: The ACE2 s2285666 and TMPRSS2 rs12329760 SNPs were significantly linked with COVID-19 disease severity, as were certain co-morbidities (hypertension, heart disease) and laboratory parameters. Both SNPs were amongst the highest predictors of disease severity: TMPRSS2 rs12329760 CT + TT [odds ratio (95% CI) 17.6 (5.1–61.10), ACE2 rs2285666 CT + TT 9.9 (3.2–30.9), both p < 0.001]. There was an increase in the expression of genotype frequencies of ACE2 rs2285666 and TMPRSS2 rs1232976 (TT), (CT + TT), and (T) allele in severe COVID-19 group compared to control and mild groups. Disease severity was also linked to elevated CRP, ferritin and D-dimer, and lower lymphocytes and platelet count (all p < 0.001).

Conclusion: ACE2 rs2285666 and TMPRSS2 rs12329760 SNPs, in addition to lymphocyte count, CRP, D-dimers, ferritin, and hypertension, are predictors of COVID-19 disease severity.

Introduction

The existing pandemic of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has produced universal crisis, devastating health organizations (1). It is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a new beta coronavirus sharing 79% sequence similarity with SARS-CoV, the agent which provoked the 2003 SARS outbreak (2). Unlike other CoVs, SARS-CoV-2 was found to have a greater worldwide spread thus it has infected more individuals than SARS-CoV-1 and the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS-CoV) combined (3).

COVID-19 dramatically increases morbidity and mortality with existing risk factors such as age and co-morbidities. Whereas most of the infected persons recover, even young and unpredictably, healthy subjects may be succumbed to the illness (4). These observations have raised the question of how the variation in COVID-19 disease severity could be explained by genetic susceptibility. The genetic factors might be related to highest extreme transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and the observed progression of the disease in a considerable proportional of the diseased population; so far, these factors are mostly undetermined. Extensive genetic studies in various populations from different geographic origins have exhibited considerable genetic disparity in protein-coding areas, with broadly variable allelic’ frequencies (5).

SARS-CoV-2 contagion is dependent mainly on the cellular factors of the infected host. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) allows entrance, and the transmembrane serine protease (TMPRSS2) permits SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein priming (6). ACE2, encoded at Xp22.2 (7), is a metallopeptidase that catalyzes conversion of angiotensin II into angiotensin I (8). TMPRSS2, encoded at 21q22.3, whose transcriptional activity is controlled by androgen receptors and which has roles in carcinogenesis (9,10). It also has specific role in cleaving viral S glycoprotein and consequently facilitating viral activation, thus it is considered one of the crucial factors for pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 (6), and inhibitors of serine proteases of TMPRSS2 block SARS-CoV-2 pathogenicity (6). TMPRSS2 also has an essential role in the cleavage of arginine and lysine residues of ACE2, thus augmenting the role of ACE during viral entry and uptake into the host cell (11) (as shown in Figure 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. Role of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in the pathogenesis of covid-19 infection.

The deterioration from mild to severe form of COVID-19 has raised the question of whether genetic factors can determine the susceptibility and/or severity of symptoms, in addition to an exaggerated immunological responses to the virus which commonly leads to a poorer outcome (12). Features involved in the spread of SARS-CoV-2 include its molecular structure, ethnic prevalence and longevity of their immune response, disease pathophysiological consequences, therapeutic interventions, and vaccination (13). Since there is considerable variation in disease behavior among COVID-19 infected patients; a multifactorial analysis may identify the possible risk factors that is involved in development and progression of COVID-19 infection. Whilst the greater part of our knowledge of the epidemiology and pathogenesis of COVID-19 has arisen from Chinese populations, relatively little in known in other racial groups. We therefore hypothesised roles for ACE2 (rs2285666) and TMPRSS2 (rs12329760) SNPs for prediction of susceptibility and severity of COVID-19 infection concerning clinical findings, laboratory investigations, and radiological data in a mixed Caucasian and African population.

Patients and Methods

We tested our hypothesis on 147 healthy controls and 299 COVID-19 patients enrolled between December 2019 and October 2020. Informed written consent was obtained before volunteers’ or patients’ enrollment. This study was approved by National Liver disease Institute review board (NLI IRB protocol N. 00222/2020). Inclusion criteria for the COVID-19 patients’ group involved patients with positive Reverse Transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for SARS-COV-2. Negative RT-PCR patients and patients with a proved other concurrent acute illness were excluded from the study. At the same time, control subjects were confirmed to be negative by RT-PCR for COVID-19.

Clinical data including age, sex, high risk occupations (physicians, nurses, pharmacists or social workers in hospitals or health care centers who are in close contact with patients, drivers, security, delivery and restaurant workers, cleaners, and teachers), co-morbidity (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, bronchial asthma) and symptoms (fever, cough, sore throat, muscle ache, headache, dyspnea, diarrhea, loss of taste, loss of smell). Diagnosis was confirmed by SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test of nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swabs collected in sterile tubes, each containing 5 ml viral transport media according to World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations (4°C for duration around 5 days and −70°C for longer duration than 5 days) using the genesig Real-Time PCR Coronavirus (COVID-19) CE IVD assay (14) which is an in vitro diagnostic test based on Real-Time PCR technology (QIAGEN, GmbH), developed for specific detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA.

All patients underwent chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). A single breath-hold with full respiration was used for examination. CT scoring was performed by clinical-data-blinded radiologists. Patients’ classification and grouping into mild, moderate, and severe were done using a CORAD radiologic scoring system previously described by Bai et al. (15) CORADS 1; normal CT, COVID-19 is highly unlikely. CORADS 2; signs of bronchiolitis as other infections with low level of COVID-19 infection suspicion. CORADS 3; Bronchopneumonia and ground-glass opacity, which is indeterminate for COVID-19 infection. CORADS 4; Unilateral ground glass with multifocal consolidations, which are highly suspicious for COVID-19 infection. CORADS 5; multifocal ground-glass appearance with consolidation. CORAD 6; positive PCR with ground-glass appearance bilaterally. Under these criteria, the most common CT features were pulmonary ground glass opacity in 91.9% with bilateral and diffuse distribution in 91 and 69.8% of the patients, respectively, and air space consolidation in 64.2% of the patients. Smooth interlobular septal thickening 64.9%. Pleural thickening and effusion and mediastinal lymphadenopathy were reported in 16, 15, and 30% of the patients, respectively.

Blood Sampling and methodologies were as follows. Ten ml of venous blood were withdrawn from the cubital vein of each subject in the study divided as follow: 3 ml were transported slowly into vacutainer EDTA tube frozen at −20°C for consequent DNA extraction and genotyping, and 2 ml of blood were transferred into another EDTA tube for determination of CBC by Sysmex XT-1800i automated hematology analyzer (Sysmex, Japan). Three ml were transferred into a plain tube for centrifugation and collection of serum for subsequent biochemical analysis of CRP by particle enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay using Cobas c501 Auto analyzer (Roche-Germany), Ferritin and LDH by particle enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay using Cobas e 601 Auto analyzers (Roche-Germany). The last 2 ml of blood were collected in sodium citrate (3.2%) vacutainer tubes for D. dimer determination using (D-DI2 Tina-quant D-Dimer Gen.2) on the Cobas 6000 analyzer (c501 module) with an expected value less than 0.5 µg fibrinogen equivalent/ml (ug FEU/ml) (16).

Genotyping of ACE2 (rs2285666) and TMPRSS2 (rs12329760) genes polymorphisms were as follows. Genomic DNA was extracted from all samples using Gene JET TM whole blood Genomic DNA purification Mini kit (Thermo Scientific EU/Lithuania) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA concentration of each sample was assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (UV spectrophotometer Q3000, Quawell Technology, Inc., United States). ACE2 (rs2285666) and TMPRSS2 (rs12329760) SNPs were analyzed using real-time polymerase chain allelic discrimination technology using TaqMan SNP genotyping assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) has been previously described (17), with catalog no C___2551626_1_&C__25622353_20 and their context sequences as follow respectively: (VIC/FAM) ATA​ATC​ACT​ACT​AAA​AAT​TAG​TAG​C(C/T)TAC​CTG​GTT​CAA​GTA​ATA​AGC​ATT​C. (VIC/FAM) CAG​GAC​TTC​CTC​TGA​GAT​GAG​TAC​A(C/T)CTG​AAG​GAT​GAA​GTT​TGG​TCC​GTA​G. The PCR reaction mixture contained 7.5 μl of TaqMan Genotyping master mixture (Applied Biosystems), 0.75 μl of TaqMan SNP (probes), 1 μl of genomic DNA (1–10 ng), and 5.75 μl nuclease-free water. Thermal conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, 40 cycles were run at 95°C for 15 s (denaturing) followed by 60°C for 1 min (annealing/extension). PCR amplification was performed by Rotor gene Q Real-Time PCR System reaction (QIAGEN, GmbH-Germany) in duplicates with 100% concordance.

Analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). Pearson’s Chi-square (χ2) test was used to determine significance of the association between two categories. Linear-by-Linear Association (LLA) test for trend results of the Crosstab procedure was applied, and it equals (N-1)*r^2, where N is the sample size, and r is the Pearson correlation between the 2 variables. LLA test, also known as the Mantel-Haenzsel test for trend. Cramér’s V was used to detect the presence of trends in a series of data by estimating the effect size following Linear-by-Linear Association. Shapiro-Wilk test as one of the normality tests was conducted to ascertain the normality of distribution, and accordingly, Unpaired t-test was used for parametric data while Mann-Whitney test was used for non-parametric ones. Linear trend analysis using the Jonckheere-Terpstra test was applied to detect whether there was an increasing or decreasing trend across the ordered groups. Mann-Kendall (M-K) test is used to detect the presence of linear or non-linear trends (steadily increasing/decreasing or unchanging) in a series of data by estimating the effect size following Jonckheere-Terpstra (J-T) Test. The two ACE2 (rs2285666) and TMPRSS2 (rs12329760) were tested for Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in patients and controls. For additional analysis of the association between ACE2 (rs2285666) and TMPRSS2 (rs12329760), genes polymorphisms, and disease severity, 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and the odds ratio (OR) were consequentially calculated in dominant, recessive1 and 2, co‐dominant, and over‐dominant genetic models. Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to detect the independent predictors for disease severity. Multiple comparisons were tested using Holm-Bonferroni Sequential Correction: An EXCEL Calculator © Justin Gaetano, 2013. p-values are statistically significant after this correction.

Results

Table 1 shows clinical and occupation data, co-morbidities, and symptoms. Almost all were linked to disease severity. The greatest six effect sizes were (in order) dysponea, muscle ache, headache, hypertension, fever, and diarrhea. Table 2 shows laboratory data, many of which were significantly linked to disease severity. The greatest six effect sizes were (in order) CRP, ferritin, D-dimers, platelets, lymphocytes, and the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio. Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) Genotype Frequencies of ACE2 (rs2285666) were significantly out of equilibrium in all diseased groups (all p < 0.001), but the TMPRSS2 (rs12329760) was out of equilibrium only in the group with severe symptoms (p = 0.009).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. Demographic criteria and COVID-19 symptoms of the studied groups.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 2. Laboratory data of the studied groups.

Table 3 shows odd’s ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the genotypes and alleles of each gene. Regarding the ACE2 SNP, both were no difference between controls and those with mild symptoms, but the TT genotype and T allele was a strong predictor of moderate disease, whilst the CT and TT genotypes, and the T allele, all strongly predicted severe disease. In contract, the TMPRSS2 CC and TT. Table 4 shows recessive, dominant, co-dominant and over-dominant models for genotype combinations. The CC v T, CC + CT v TT and CC v CT + TT models of the ACE2 SNP were all significant predictor of COVID-19 infection, whilst all models of the TMPRSS2 SNP were significant predictors.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 3. ACE2 (rs2285666) and TMPRSS2 (rs12329760) gene polymorphisms in patients’ groups and the controls.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 4. Distribution of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 SNPs in different genetic models.

Table 5 shows results of a binary logistic regression analysis performed to determine those factors mostly likely to predict disease severity. It was found that disease severity was associated with age, TMPRSS2 variant CT + TT, ACE2 variant CT + TT, neutrophils, ferritin level and CRP. The logistic regression model was statistically significant, χ = 90.55 p < 0.001. The model explained 86% (Nagelkerke R2) of the variance in severity and correctly classified 94.8% of cases. Table 6 shows interactions between these genotypes and key laboratory indices. Ferritin, LDH and D-Dimers were strongly linked to the variants in both genes, but the platelet count was strongly linked only to the TMPRSS2 genotype. Similarly, Table 7 shows distribution of symptoms according to genotype. Both were linked strongly to fever, headache, and dysponea, whilst the ACE2 SNP was strongly linked to sore throat and muscle ache, and the TMPRSS2 SNP to diarrhea.

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 5. Binary Logistic regression analysis for predictors of COVID-19 infection severity.

TABLE 6
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 6. Distribution of Laboratory data according to ACE2 and TMPRSS2 SNPs.

TABLE 7
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 7. Distribution of associated symptoms according to ACE2 and TMPRSS2 SNPs.

Discussion

The principle finding in our study was an increase in expression of genotype frequencies ACE2 rs2285666 (TT), (CT + TT), and the allele (T) frequency in moderate and severe COVID-19 groups, and these SNPs were the highest predictors of disease severity by logistic regression analysis. Incorporating these into a model with age, sex, neutrophil count, ferritin, and CRP explained 86% of the variability in disease severity and correctly identified almost 95% of cases.

Our data adds to considerable literature on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in COVID-19 pathogenesis. For example, the CC or CT genotype causes higher levels of circulating ACE2 in comparison to TT genotype(18), ACE2 lowers blood pressure by several mechanisms as vasodilation; stimulation of sodium and water elimination in urine as well as nitric oxide production (19), and ACE2 levels contribute to SARS-CoV-2 infection severity and complications (20). It has long been established that ACE genotypes are linked to hypertension and so cardiovascular disease (2127) and we show that hypertension is a leading risk factor for disease severity. We speculate that this is because of a pathophysiological causal link between ACE2 rs2285666, hypertension and disease severity.

The association of elevated D-dimer and COVID-19 disease severity in this study reflects the ongoing activation of the hemostatic system and, potentially, cardiovascular complications. This may be linked to a genetic basis as the increased D-dimer were also significantly associated with the ACE2 rs2285666 (CT + TT) SNP as this genotype is linked to potentially thrombotic atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (28,29). This prompted Srivastava et al. (30) to speculate that this gene might be a predisposing factor for COVID-19 case-fatality. The significant platelet reduction in the current study was amongst the highest predictors of disease severity and was significantly associated with the expression of ACE2 rs2285666 and TMPRESS2 rs12329760 (CT + TT) gene polymorphism. Thrombocytopenia in COVID-19 infection may be due to platelet aggregation in microthrombus, high autoantibodies increasing platelet destruction, or cytokine storm inducing bone marrow suppression (31).

Several studies have reported increased markers of inflammation, such as CRP, LDH, and ferritin, in COVID-19 infection (13). Our data showed that ferritin, CRP, D-dimers, alongside the lymphocyte and neutrophil counts, contributed to COVID-19 disease severity. Many of these changes may reflect increased cytokine activity, whilst Badawi (32) reviewed the evidence that genetic polymorphisms within an individual’s ACE2-positive cells population is linked to hypercytokinaemia and so their response to COVID-19 disease. Our data fits with this hypothesis, in that we show that ACE2 rs2285666 (CT + TT) SNPs are linked to alterations in inflammatory and other biomarkers (CRP, LDH, ferritin, D-dimer, lymphocytes and neutrophils), some of which are predictive criteria of a COVID-19 cytokine storm (33).

Genotype frequencies TMPRSS2 (rs12329760) TT and CT + TT, and allele frequency T showed a significant increase in the severe COVID-19 group in the current study. Additionally, it was among the highest predictors of disease severity in logistic regression analysis, an observation that supports the hypotheses of Strope et al. (34) and Singh et al. (35) that these SNPs are directly pathogenic. The latter also suggest that sex may have a role in the pathogenicity of the TMPRSS2 SNPs, citing differences in gene responses to androgens, so being linked to sex polymorphism-specific effects, as TMPRSS2 is expressed in androgen-sensitive tissues, and to some extent, the weakly significant effect of sex on disease severity in our study may reflect this proposition. The current results showed a significant association of the TMPRSS2 rs12329760 (CT + TT) SNP with increased inflammatory marker CRP, and ferritin, LDH and D-Dimer. Iwata-Yoshikawa et al. (36) used a murine TMPRSS2 knock-out to speculate that the molecule (and by implication, its genotype variants) has a role in inflammatory responses to SARS-CoV. TMPRESS2 expression in the digestive tract (37) represents a route of viral entry; thus, certain SNPs may be related to gastrointestinal symptoms of the disease such as diarrhea.

We recognise the limitation of a relatively small sample size, and so the difficulty in making further speculations regarding links between these SNPs and other research indices. Nevertheless, our data represents an advance in biomedical science because it shows the power of ACE2 (rs2285666) and TMPRSS2 (rs12329760) gene polymorphisms to predict COVID-19-related disease severity that, in addition to routine cell and serum markers, explains 86% of the severity.

Summary Table

What is Known About This Subject?

• SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing COVID-19, largely gains entry to the cell via the effects of ACE2 and TMPRSS2.

• Mortality is linked to co-morbidities such as age, obesity, hypertension, and diabetes, and to laboratory markers such as D-dimers, ferritin, and CRP.

• Although the greater part of our knowledge of COVID-19 has come from studies on Chinese populations, studies on other racial and ethnic groups are being described, with some discrepancies.

What Does This Report Add?

• The leading predictors of the severity of a COVID-19 infection are hypertension, raised CRP, D-dimers and ferritin, and low platelets and lymphocytes.

• ACE2 rs2285666 and TMPRSS2 rs12329760 genotypes and alleles are linked to disease severity.

• Together, these SNPs and laboratory indices explain a large proportion of the variability in the severity of an infection.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

This study was approved by National Liver Institute Review Board NLI IRB protocol N. 00222/2020.

Author Contributions

SA, HK, SE, AA and FK were involved in conceptualization. SA, HK, AA and FK developed and validate the methodology. GA, AZ, and FK were involved in the recruitment of patients. ZK, SA, HK, SE and RA-E undertook the formal analysis. SA, HK, SE, AA, GA, AZ, FK and RA-E undertook writing original draft preparation. HA, SA, HK, SE and ZK, undertook writing review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript, and agree to be accountable for the content of the work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere appreciation to Yasmin Hosny Hemed, MD Department of radio diagnosis, interventional radiology and medical imaging, Faculty of Medicine, and Menoufia University to provide the Axial and coronal unenhanced chest HRCT images and the participant patients for their contribution to this work. All thanks to all patients and volunteers for accepting to participate in this work and give us some of their precious time.

References

1. Ghafouri-Fard, S, Noroozi, R, Vafaee, R, Branicki, W, Poṡpiech, E, and Pyrc, K. Effects of Host Genetic Variations on Response to, Susceptibility and Severity of Respiratory Infections. Biomed Pharmacother (2020) 128:110296. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110296

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Mollica, V, Rizzo, A, and Massari, F. The Pivotal Role of TMPRSS2 in Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Prostate Cancer. Future Oncol (2020) 16:2029–33. doi:10.2217/fon-2020-0571

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Ashour, HM, Elkhatib, WF, Rahman, MM, and Elshabrawy, HA. Insights into the Recent 2019 Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) in Light of Past Human Coronavirus Outbreaks. Pathogens (2020) 9(3):186. doi:10.3390/pathogens9030186

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Dong, Y, Mo, X, Hu, Y, Qi, X, Jiang, F, and Jiang, Z. Epidemiology of COVID-19 Among Children in China. Pediatrics (2020) 145:145. doi:10.1542/peds.2020-0702

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Lek, M, Karczewski, KJ, Minikel, EV, Samocha, KE, Banks, E, and Fennell, T. Analysis of Protein-Coding Genetic Variation in 60,706 Humans. Nature (2016) 536(7616):285–91. doi:10.1038/nature19057

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Hoffmann, M, Kleine-Weber, H, Schroeder, S, Krüger, N, Herrler, T, and Erichsen, S. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. cell (2020) 181:271–80. e278. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Oladejo, BO, Adeboboye, CF, and Adebolu, TT. Understanding the Genetic Determinant of Severity in Viral Diseases: a Case of SARS-Cov-2 Infection. Egypt J Med Hum Genet (2020) 21:1–11. doi:10.1186/s43042-020-00122-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Kuba, K, Imai, Y, and Penninger, J. Angiotensin-converting Enzyme 2 in Lung Diseases. Curr Opin Pharmacol (2006) 6:271–6. doi:10.1016/j.coph.2006.03.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Lucas, JM, Heinlein, C, Kim, T, Hernandez, SA, Malik, MS, and True, LD. The Androgen-Regulated Protease TMPRSS2 Activates a Proteolytic cascade Involving Components of the Tumor Microenvironment and Promotes Prostate Cancer Metastasis. Cancer Discov (2014) 4:1310–25. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-13-1010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Stopsack, KH, Mucci, LA, Antonarakis, ES, Nelson, PS, and Kantoff, PW. TMPRSS2 and COVID-19: Serendipity or Opportunity for Intervention? Cancer Discov (2020) 10:779–82. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-0451

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Heurich, A, Hofmann-Winkler, H, Gierer, S, Liepold, T, Jahn, O, and Pohlmann, S. TMPRSS2 and ADAM17 Cleave ACE2 Differentially and Only Proteolysis by TMPRSS2 Augments Entry Driven by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Spike Protein. J Virol (2014) 88:1293–307. doi:10.1128/jvi.02202-13

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Singh, H, Choudhari, R, Nema, V, and Khan, AA. ACE2 and TMPRSS2 Polymorphisms in Various Diseases with Special Reference to its Impact on COVID-19 Disease. Microb Pathogenesis (2021) 150:104621. doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104621

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Salvamani, S, Tan, H, Thang, W, Ter, H, Wan, M, and Gunasekaran, B. Understanding the Dynamics of COVID-19; Implications for Therapeutic Intervention, Vaccine Development and Movement Control. Br J Biomed Sci (2020) 77:168–84. doi:10.1080/09674845.2020.1826136

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Torretta, S, Zuccotti, G, Cristofaro, V, Ettori, J, Solimeno, L, and Battilocchi, L. Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR Using Different Sample Sources: Review of the Literature. Ear Nose Throat J (2020) 100(2_Suppl. l):131S–138S. doi:10.1177/0145561320953231

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Bai, HX, Hsieh, B, Xiong, Z, Halsey, K, Choi, JW, and Tran, TML. Performance of Radiologists in Differentiating COVID-19 from Non-COVID-19 Viral Pneumonia at Chest CT. Radiology (2020) 296:E46–E54. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200823

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Lindahl, TL, Lundahl, TH, and Fransson, SG. Evaluation of an Automated Micro-latex D-Dimer Assay (Tina-quant on Hitachi 911 Analyser) in Symptomatic Outpatients with Suspected DVT. Thromb Haemost (1999) 82:1772–3.

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Yan, X, Landen, S, Jacques, M, and Papadimitriou, I. PL-030 the Effects of ACE Gene Polymorphisms on ACE Content before and after High-Intensity Interval Exercise. Exerc Biochem Rev (2018) 1(1):1. doi:10.14428/ebr.v1i1.8483

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Chaudhary, M. COVID-19 Susceptibility: Potential of ACE2 Polymorphisms. Egypt J Med Hum Genet (2020) 21:1–8. doi:10.1186/s43042-020-00099-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. South, AM, Shaltout, HA, Washburn, LK, Hendricks, AS, Diz, DI, and Chappell, MC. Fetal Programming and the Angiotensin-(1-7) axis: a Review of the Experimental and Clinical Data. Clin Sci (2019) 133:55–74. doi:10.1042/cs20171550

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Verdecchia, P, Cavallini, C, Spanevello, A, and Angeli, F. The Pivotal Link between ACE2 Deficiency and SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Eur J Intern Med (2020) 76:14–20. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2020.04.037

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Zhao, Q, Hixson, JE, Rao, DC, Gu, D, Jaquish, CE, and Rice, T. Genetic Variants in the Apelin System and Blood Pressure Responses to Dietary Sodium Interventions: a Family-Based Association Study. J Hypertens (2010) 28:756–63. doi:10.1097/hjh.0b013e3283370d32

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Zhong, J, Yan, Z, Liu, D, Ni, Y, Zhao, Z, and Zhu, S. Association of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Gene A/G Polymorphism and Elevated Blood Pressure in Chinese Patients with Metabolic Syndrome. J Lab Clin Med (2006) 147:91–5. doi:10.1016/j.lab.2005.10.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Benjafield, A, Wang, WY, and Morris, BJ. No Association of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Gene (ACE2) Polymorphisms with Essential Hypertension*1. Am J Hypertens (2004) 17:624–8. doi:10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.02.022

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Patnaik, M, Pati, P, Swain, SN, Mohapatra, MK, Dwibedi, B, and Kar, SK. Association of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme-2 Gene Polymorphisms with Essential Hypertension in the Population of Odisha, India. Ann Hum Biol (2014) 41:145–52. doi:10.3109/03014460.2013.837195

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Lu, N, Yang, Y, Wang, Y, Liu, Y, Fu, G, and Chen, D. ACE2 Gene Polymorphism and Essential Hypertension: an Updated Meta-Analysis Involving 11,051 Subjects. Mol Biol Rep (2012) 39:6581–9. doi:10.1007/s11033-012-1487-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Yi, L, Gu, Y, Wang, X, An, L, Xie, X, and Shao, W. Association of ACE, ACE2 and UTS2 Polymorphisms with Essential Hypertension in Han and Dongxiang Populations from north-western China. J Int Med Res (2006) 34:272–83. doi:10.1177/147323000603400306

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Fan, X-h., Wang, Y-b., Wang, H, Sun, K, Zhang, W-l., and Song, X-d. Polymorphisms of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) and ACE2 Are Not Associated with Orthostatic Blood Pressure Dysregulation in Hypertensive Patients. Acta Pharmacol Sin (2009) 30:1237–44. doi:10.1038/aps.2009.110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Wu, Y-H, Li, J-Y, Wang, C, Zhang, L-M, and Qiao, H. TheACE2G8790A Polymorphism: Involvement in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Combined with Cerebral Stroke. J Clin Lab Anal (2017) 31:e22033. doi:10.1002/jcla.22033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Luo, Y, Liu, C, Guan, T, Li, Y, Lai, Y, and Li, F. Association of ACE2 Genetic Polymorphisms with Hypertension-Related Target Organ Damages in South Xinjiang. Hypertens Res (2019) 42:681–9. doi:10.1038/s41440-018-0166-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Srivastava, A, Bandopadhyay, A, Das, D, Pandey, RK, Singh, V, and Khanam, N. Genetic Association of ACE2 Rs2285666 Polymorphism with COVID-19 Spatial Distribution in India. Front Genet (2020) 11:564741. doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.564741

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Xu, P, Zhou, Q, and Xu, J. Mechanism of Thrombocytopenia in COVID-19 Patients. Ann Hematol (2020) 99:1205–8. doi:10.1007/s00277-020-04019-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Badawi, A. Hypercytokinemia and Pathogen-Host Interaction in COVID-19. Jir (2020) 13:255–61. doi:10.2147/jir.s259096

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Caricchio, R, Gallucci, M, Dass, C, Zhang, X, Gallucci, S, and Fleece, D. Preliminary Predictive Criteria for COVID-19 Cytokine Storm. Ann Rheum Dis (2021) 80:88–95. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218323

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Strope, JD, PharmDTMPRSS2, CHC, and Figg, WD. TMPRSS2: Potential Biomarker for COVID-19 Outcomes. J Clin Pharmacol (2020) 60:801–7. doi:10.1002/jcph.1641

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Singh, H, Choudhari, R, Nema, V, and Khan, AA. ACE2 and TMPRSS2 Polymorphisms in Various Diseases with Special Reference to its Impact on COVID-19 Disease. Microb Pathog (2020) 150:104621. doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104621

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Iwata-Yoshikawa, N, Okamura, T, Shimizu, Y, Hasegawa, H, Takeda, M, and Nagata, N. TMPRSS2 Contributes to Virus Spread and Immunopathology in the Airways of Murine Models after Coronavirus Infection. J Virol (2019) 93:1. doi:10.1128/JVI.01815-18

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Bertram, S, Heurich, A, Lavender, H, Gierer, S, Danisch, S, and Perin, P. Influenza and SARS-Coronavirus Activating Proteases TMPRSS2 and HAT Are Expressed at Multiple Sites in Human Respiratory and Gastrointestinal Tracts. PloS one (2012) 7:e35876. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035876

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: ACE2 gene, TMPRSS2 gene, thromboembolic complications, determinants of COVID-19 disease, cytokine storm, genetic susceptibility of COVID-19

Citation: Abdelsattar S, Kasemy ZA, Ewida SF, Abo-Elsoud RAA, Zytoon AA, Abdelaal GA, Abdelgawad AS, Khalil FO and Kamel HFM (2022) ACE2 and TMPRSS2 SNPs as Determinants of Susceptibility to, and Severity of, a COVID-19 Infection. Br J Biomed Sci 79:10238. doi: 10.3389/bjbs.2021.10238

Received: 15 November 2021; Accepted: 02 December 2021;
Published: 12 January 2022.

Copyright © 2022 Abdelsattar, Kasemy, Ewida, Abo-Elsoud, Zytoon, Abdelaal, Abdelgawad, Khalil and Kamel. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: S. Abdelsattar, Shimaa.abdelsattar@liver.menofia.edu.eg

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.