AUTHOR=Stabilini Cesare , Muysoms Filip E. , Tzanis Alexander A. , Rossi Lisa , Koutsiouroumpa Ourania , Mavridis Dimitris , Adamina Michel , Bracale Umberto , Brandsma Henk-Thijs , Breukink Stéphanie O. , López Cano Manuel , Cole Samantha , Doré Suzanne , Jensen Kristian Kiim , Krogsgaard Marianne , Smart Neil J. , Odensten Christoffer , Tielemans Chantal , Antoniou Stavros A. TITLE=EHS Rapid Guideline: Evidence-Informed European Recommendations on Parastomal Hernia Prevention—With ESCP and EAES Participation JOURNAL=Journal of Abdominal Wall Surgery VOLUME=2 YEAR=2023 URL=https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/journals/journal-of-abdominal-wall-surgery/articles/10.3389/jaws.2023.11549 DOI=10.3389/jaws.2023.11549 ISSN=2813-2092 ABSTRACT=

Background: Growing evidence on the use of mesh as a prophylactic measure to prevent parastomal hernia and advances in guideline development methods prompted an update of a previous guideline on parastomal hernia prevention.

Objective: To develop evidence-based, trustworthy recommendations, informed by an interdisciplinary panel of stakeholders.

Methods: We updated a previous systematic review on the use of a prophylactic mesh for end colostomy, and we synthesized evidence using pairwise meta-analysis. A European panel of surgeons, stoma care nurses, and patients developed an evidence-to-decision framework in line with GRADE and Guidelines International Network standards, moderated by a certified guideline methodologist. The framework considered benefits and harms, the certainty of the evidence, patients’ preferences and values, cost and resources considerations, acceptability, equity and feasibility.

Results: The certainty of the evidence was moderate for parastomal hernia and low for major morbidity, surgery for parastomal hernia, and quality of life. There was unanimous consensus among panel members for a conditional recommendation for the use of a prophylactic mesh in patients with an end colostomy and fair life expectancy, and a strong recommendation for the use of a prophylactic mesh in patients at high risk to develop a parastomal hernia.

Conclusion: This rapid guideline provides evidence-informed, interdisciplinary recommendations on the use of prophylactic mesh in patients with an end colostomy. Further, it identifies research gaps, and discusses implications for stakeholders, including overcoming barriers to implementation and specific considerations regarding validity.