AUTHOR=Bobba Christopher M. , Whitson Bryan A. , Henn Matthew C. , Mokadam Nahush A. , Keller Brian C. , Rosenheck Justin , Ganapathi Asvin M. 

TITLE=Trends in Donation After Circulatory Death in Lung Transplantation in the United States: Impact Of Era

JOURNAL=Transplant International

VOLUME=35

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/journals/transplant-international/articles/10.3389/ti.2022.10172

DOI=10.3389/ti.2022.10172

ISSN=1432-2277

ABSTRACT=<p><bold>Background:</bold> Use of lungs donated after circulatory death (DCD) has expanded, but changes in donor/recipient characteristics and comparison to brain dead donors (DBD) has not been studied. We examined the evolution of the use of DCD lungs for transplantation and compare outcomes to DBD lungs.</p><p><bold>Methods:</bold> The SRTR database was used to construct three 5-year intervals. Perioperative variables and survival were compared by era and for DCD vs. DBD. Geographic variation was estimated using recipient permanent address.</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> 728 DCD and 27,205 DBD lung transplants were identified. DCD volume increased from Era 1 (<italic>n</italic> = 73) to Era 3 (<italic>n</italic> = 528), representing 1.1% and 4.2% of lung transplants. Proportionally more DCD recipients were in ICU or on ECMO pre-transplant, and had shorter waitlist times. DCD donors were older, had lower PaO2/FiO2 ratios compared to DBD, more likely to be bilateral, had longer ischemic time, length of stay, post-op dialysis, and increased use of lung perfusion. There was no difference in overall survival. Geographically, use was heterogeneous.</p><p><bold>Conclusion:</bold> DCD utilization is low but increasing. Despite increasing ischemic time and transplantation into sicker patients, survival is similar, which supports further DCD use in lung transplantation. DCD lung transplantation presents an opportunity to continue to expand the donor pool.</p>